Back on Jan. 14 I wrote about a day in court at the Kansas Court of Appeals. After you have your day in court, you wait. And wait. And then finally a decision is announced. Today was a good day for the good guys. The opinion is posted here. If anybody’s curious about what I do for a living, that’ll show you a little about it. The opinion hasn’t arrived in the mail yet, but I’ve been watching the Appellate Courts website. The other side will, no doubt, file a motion for reconsideration, and then a motion for rehearing in the Supreme Court, but it won’t change anything. This was actually a pretty significant case. It doesn’t set any new precedent or anything, but it reaffirms and clarifies some basic principles about real estate titles. In view of the decision that was made by the district judge, these principles were apparently in need of some reaffirming.
Sweet Vindication
February 12, 2005
General
Comments Off on Sweet Vindication
John
Back on Jan. 14 I wrote about a day in court at the Kansas Court of Appeals. After you have your day in court, you wait. And wait. And then finally a decision is announced. Today was a good day for the good guys. The opinion is posted here. If anybody’s curious about what I do for a living, that’ll show you a little about it. The opinion hasn’t arrived in the mail yet, but I’ve been watching the Appellate Courts website. The other side will, no doubt, file a motion for reconsideration, and then a motion for rehearing in the Supreme Court, but it won’t change anything. This was actually a pretty significant case. It doesn’t set any new precedent or anything, but it reaffirms and clarifies some basic principles about real estate titles. In view of the decision that was made by the district judge, these principles were apparently in need of some reaffirming.